Registered: 1099834329 Posts: 575
Registered: 1076993590 Posts: 6,431
Reply with quote #2
No. Absolutely, No. No. No. No. No.
Am I clear? __________________ Some wisdom from Winston Churchill:
"Once in a while you will stumble upon the truth but most of us manage to pick ourselves up and hurry along as if nothing had happened."
"You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life."
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else."
Registered: 1083124486 Posts: 1,911
Reply with quote #3
Interesting. Of course this would then add different types of problems and strategies. So, no for me also.
Registered: 1075147142 Posts: 14,643
Reply with quote #4
Dont mess with the sport.
The US tried it in the seventies with deciding there would be no drawn matches and the awful 1 on 1 with the GK crap was introduced.
The structure has always been 90 minutes split into 2 x 45 minutes for older youths and adults
- Goals 15yds wide, 10ft tall?? - No tackling? - First goal wins?
Registered: 1279773116 Posts: 1,515
Reply with quote #5
It sounds like someone has been watching field hockey the past few years. They went from 2x35 to 4x15, and you can now take your own free hits.
Registered: 1083166859 Posts: 429
Reply with quote #6
The only change I could support is the penalty goal for handling on the goal line. The defender receiving a goal kick inside the area might make sense for u10, but I prefer opposing players having to drop back to midfield. All the others are a full NO.